public class InverseFromDensityGen extends RandomVariateGen
The algorithm may fail for some distributions for which the density becomes infinite at a point (for ex. the Gamma and the Beta distributions with α < 1) if one requires too high a precision (a too small eps, for ex. ε∼10-15). However, it should work also for continuous densities with finite discontinuities.
While the setup time is relatively slow, the generation of random variables is extremely fast and practically independent of the required precision and of the specific distribution. The following table shows the time needed (in seconds) to generate 108 random numbers using inversion from a given class, then the numerical inversion with Gauss-Lobatto integration implemented here, and finally the speed ratios between the two methods. The speed ratio is the speed of the latter over the former. Thus for the beta distribution with parameters (5, 500), generating random variables with the Gauss-Lobatto integration implemented in this class is more than 1700 times faster than using inversion from the BetaDist class. These tests were made on a machine with processor AMD Athlon 4000, running Red Hat Linux, with clock speed at 2403 MHz.
| Distribution | Inversion | Gauss-Lobatto | speed ratio |
| NormalDist(10.5, 5) | 9.19 | 8.89 | 1.03 |
| ExponentialDist(5) | 17.72 | 8.82 | 2.0 |
| CauchyDist(10.5, 5) | 18.30 | 8.81 | 2.1 |
| BetaSymmetricalDist(10.5) | 242.80 | 8.85 | 27.4 |
| GammaDist(55) | 899.50 | 8.89 | 101 |
| ChiSquareNoncentralDist(10.5, 5) | 5326.90 | 8.85 | 602 |
| BetaDist(5, 500) | 15469.10 | 8.86 | 1746 |
The following table gives the time (in sec.) needed to create an object (setup time) and to generate one random variable for this class compared to the same for the inversion method specific to each class, and the ratios of the times (init + one random variable) of the two methods. For inversion, we initialized 108 times; for this class, we initialized 104 times.
| Distribution | Inversion | Gauss-Lobatto | time ratio |
| 108 init | 104 init | for 1 init | |
| NormalDist(10.5, 5) | 5.30 | 38.29 | 26426 |
| ExponentialDist(5) | 3.98 | 27.05 | 12466 |
| CauchyDist(10.5, 5) | 5.05 | 58.39 | 25007 |
| BetaSymmetricalDist(10.5) | 90.66 | 68.33 | 2049 |
| GammaDist(55) | 13.15 | 58.34 | 639 |
| ChiSquareNoncentralDist(10.5, 5) | 190.48 | 248.98 | 451 |
| BetaDist(5, 500) | 63.60 | 116.57 | 75 |
If only a few random variables are needed, then using this class is not efficient because of the slow set-up. But if one wants to generate large samples from the same distribution with fixed parameters, then this class will be very efficient. The following table gives the number of random variables generated beyond which, using this class will be worthwhile.
| Distribution | number of generated variables |
| NormalDist(10.5, 5) | 41665 |
| ExponentialDist(5) | 15266 |
| CauchyDist(10.5, 5) | 31907 |
| BetaSymmetricalDist(10.5) | 2814 |
| GammaDist(55) | 649 |
| ChiSquareNoncentralDist(10.5, 5) | 467 |
| BetaDist(5, 500) | 75 |
Thus, for example, if one needs to generate less than 15266 exponential random variables, then using the InverseFromDensityGen class is not wortwhile: it will be faster to use inversion from the ExponentialGen class.
| Constructor and Description |
|---|
InverseFromDensityGen(RandomStream s,
ContinuousDistribution dis,
double xc,
double eps,
int order)
Creates a new generator for the continuous distribution
dis, using stream s.
|
InverseFromDensityGen(RandomStream s,
MathFunction dens,
double xc,
double eps,
int order,
double xleft,
double xright)
Creates a new generator from the continuous probability density
dens.
|
| Modifier and Type | Method and Description |
|---|---|
double |
getEpsilon()
Returns the u-resolution eps associated with this object.
|
int |
getOrder()
Returns the order associated with this object.
|
double |
getXc()
Returns the xc given in the constructor.
|
double |
nextDouble()
Generates a new random variate.
|
getDistribution, getStream, nextArrayOfDouble, setStreampublic InverseFromDensityGen(RandomStream s, ContinuousDistribution dis, double xc, double eps, int order)
setXinf
and
setXsup
of dis, for better efficiency.
Argument xc can be the mean,
the mode or any other x for which the density is relatively large.
The u-resolution eps is the desired absolute error in the CDF,
and order is the degree of the
Newton interpolating polynomial over each interval.
An order of 3 or 5, and an eps of 10-6 to 10-12
are usually good choices.
Restrictions:
3 <= public InverseFromDensityGen(RandomStream s, MathFunction dens, double xc, double eps, int order, double xleft, double xright)
public double nextDouble()
nextDouble in class RandomVariateGenpublic double getXc()
public double getEpsilon()
public int getOrder()
To submit a bug or ask questions, send an e-mail to Pierre L'Ecuyer.